AP NEWS
Click to copy
Click to copy

CFPB’s Kraninger reverses Mulvaney changes to advisory board

March 21, 2019
FILE- In this March 7, 2019, file photo Kathy Kraninger, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, takes questions from the House Financial Services Committee's biannual review of the CFPB, on Capitol Hill in Washington. The new head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has reversed yet another policy set by her predecessor at the financial watchdog. Kraninger said Thursday, March 21, that she would lengthen the board members’ tenure to two years, and would allow half of the board’s existing membership to continue serving. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
FILE- In this March 7, 2019, file photo Kathy Kraninger, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, takes questions from the House Financial Services Committee's biannual review of the CFPB, on Capitol Hill in Washington. The new head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has reversed yet another policy set by her predecessor at the financial watchdog. Kraninger said Thursday, March 21, that she would lengthen the board members’ tenure to two years, and would allow half of the board’s existing membership to continue serving. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

NEW YORK (AP) — The new head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is reversing yet another policy set by her predecessor by giving more sway to a group of committees that advise the financial watchdog.

CFPB Director Kathy Kraninger said Thursday that she would lengthen the tenure of members of the Consumer Advisory Board and three other committees to two years, and would allow half of the committees’ existing membership to continue serving. The agency would also increase the number of in-person board meetings per year from two to three.

Mick Mulvaney, who ran the CFPB for President Donald Trump on a temporary basis until last December, dissolved the Consumer Advisory Board and other groups, which act as a sounding board for the agency on important economic and financial issues as well as policy. Consumer groups had expressed outrage at the move, saying it stopped important dialogue between the CFPB and outside groups.

The CFPB is a highly independent agency, and receives its budget not from Congress but from the Federal Reserve, which allows the CFPB to act as it wishes without the support of Congress. However when Congress created the CFPB, it required that the bureau create advisory boards consisting of community members, banks, credit unions and academics to advise the bureau on policy decisions. The bureau was required by law to meet with these groups at least twice a year.

Mulvaney argued that while the bureau had to meet with these groups, who made up the groups was largely up to the director. In June, he dissolved the existing boards entirely and reconstituted them with a smaller, new, hand-picked membership. He also reduced the tenure of the board members from three years to one year, a move consumer groups felt destroyed any institutional knowledge these boards may have had, since membership would change each year.

Kraninger did leave open the question on how big these boards would be going forward. The Consumer Advisory Board had 25 members before Mulvaney reduced it to nine.

“That was one of the changes that we had found most troubling because it reduces the amount of diversity and depth of perspective (of the board),” said Chi Chi Wu, a lawyer for the National Consumer Law Center and one of the members of the Consumer Advisory Board before Mulvaney dissolved it. “The real test will be who gets appointed: will we see strong consumer advocates appointed to the (board)?”

One of Kraninger’s first moves after taking over the bureau was to stop the debate over the bureau’s name. Mulvaney moved to change the name of the CFPB to the “Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection,” which is the legal name of the bureau but had never been used in the bureau’s branding. She brought an end to the debate, saying the CFPB’s name would stay the CFPB in most circumstances.

With these exceptions, Kraninger has backed most of her predecessor’s more substantial changes. For example, the bureau under her leadership has decided to move forward with possibly repealing its rules governing the payday lending industry. It was a move started under Mulvaney.

All contents © copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.