Related topics

Strong showing for Navalny in Moscow mayoral race

September 8, 2013 GMT

MOSCOW (AP) — Opposition leader Alexei Navalny swept up far more votes than expected Sunday while finishing second in Moscow’s mayoral election, a pivotal contest that has energized Russia’s small opposition in ways that could pose a risk to the Kremlin in the days and years ahead.

Even so, Navalny said he suspected that the vote count was inflated for the Kremlin-backed incumbent and he threatened to call his supporters out onto the street in protest on Monday if the concerns were not addressed.


Nearly complete results released early Monday showed Navalny with more than 27 percent of the vote, while incumbent Sergei Sobyanin held a clear lead with about 51 percent, just enough to avoid a runoff. Exit polls, however, predicted Navalny would get as much as 32 percent.

As the results began to trickle out only two hours after the polls closed, Navalny said he suspected the vote count was being manipulated.

“We don’t recognize the results that are currently being announced, and I would like to say that we won’t give up one vote that we received,” Navalny told reporters at his campaign headquarters late Sunday. “I call on the Kremlin and the mayor’s office to restrain themselves from falsifications.”

The election was being watched for what it bodes for the future of the opposition and for Navalny. He faces time in prison after being convicted of embezzlement in a case seen as part of a Kremlin effort to sideline him, but his strong showing could lead to a shortening of his five-year sentence, if the Kremlin feels this would help defuse discontent.

Sobyanin needs more than 50 percent to win in the first round, but if he is seen as squeaking through unfairly because of vote-rigging, it could set off protests. It was reports of widespread fraud in a national parliamentary election in 2011 that triggered the unprecedented demonstrations against President Vladimir Putin’s rule.

Navalny’s campaign said its own exit polls showed Sobyanin below 50 percent. A separate vote count by observers also cast doubt on Sobyanin’s clear majority.

Navalny said he suspected Sobyanin’s results were boosted by falsifying the vote count of those who voted at home rather than at a polling station, a system designed to accommodate the elderly and disabled. He called for these votes to be annulled and for a second round to be held.

“If the mayor’s office and Kremlin ignore the people’s demands, then we will call everyone out onto the streets of the city,” Navalny tweeted.


With ballots from about 90 percent of precincts counted, Sobyanin had about 51 percent and Navalny just over 27. The four other candidates trailed far behind.

Golos, Russia’s leading independent election monitor, said the voting appeared to have gone smoothly, but there were fears that election officials would artificially increase the turnout to allow them to add votes for Sobyanin.

“This is the dilemma: Either they manipulate something somehow, but then they could be caught and won’t be able to sleep soundly on Monday,” Golos co-chairman Grigory Melkonyants said. “Or they could let it be a real election and allow a second round.”

Unusually, election officials had not released a final turnout figure by early Monday. Two hours before the polls closed, turnout was registered at a low 26.5 percent.

Golos observers noted that voter rolls at some polling stations had been padded with people who no longer lived in the neighborhood. They also noted that many people coming to the polls who receive benefits or salaries from the state had been pressured to do so. One woman demanded a document stating that she had voted, supposedly as proof for the state hospital where she worked, the group said.

Anna Grishina, a retiree who came out of the polling station soon after Navalny, clutched her cane and said proudly that she’d voted for Sobyanin.

“I don’t see them,” she said, when asked about which changes Sobyanin had brought to the city. “But I hear about them on TV. He’s opened new metro stations and redone the roads. I can’t remember all of the things right now.”

The elderly are Sobyanin’s core constituency, while the young and middle class are more likely to oppose Putin and his team. Sobyanin was Putin’s deputy from 2005 until he was appointed Moscow mayor in 2010.

“Sobyanin and Putin spend most of their time lining their own pockets,” said Alexei Gorshkov, a 34-year-old employee in the IT sector who voted for Navalny. “It doesn’t matter who you vote for today, as long as you vote against Sobyanin. If there’s a run-off, Navalny will have a real chance.”

Navalny first built his following online through his anti-corruption blog, but it was the protests of 2011 and 2012 that cemented his status as de facto leader of the opposition. He led street marches that attracted tens of thousands of people from across the political spectrum.

His mayoral candidacy inspired a grassroots campaign like nothing the city had ever seen before. About 20,000 volunteers hit the campaign trail for Navalny, passing out leaflets in the metro or hanging banners on balconies. Navalny held impromptu campaign rallies outside subway stations several times a day.

Sobyanin did not actively campaign, preferring instead to play the regal incumbent and let his work as mayor speak for itself.

Sunday’s mayoral election was the first since 2003 and the first since the Kremlin last year reversed Putin’s 2004 decree abolishing direct elections for the Moscow mayor and other regional leaders.

Since Putin returned to the presidency for a third term, the Kremlin has cracked down on the opposition and tried to stifle dissent.

Navalny was sentenced in July to five years in prison for embezzlement in a case that he and his supporters describe as legally dubious and punishment for his exposure of high-level corruption. He left the courtroom in handcuffs, but a day later in a surprise turnaround, prosecutors requested he be set free until his appeal could be heard.

Most have speculated that it was Sobyanin who had Navalny set free, in order to ensure that the election would look as fair as possible and legitimize the Kremlin candidate as a politician.