Nationwide liver transplant policy caught up in court case

May 20, 2019 GMT

ATLANTA (AP) — Organ transplant officials are rolling back a new nationwide policy over how to allocate scarce livers amid a legal fight in federal court, an attorney for the nonprofit that manages the U.S. transplant system said Monday.

The United Network for Organ Sharing was on track to reinstate its old policy by Thursday morning, Sara Frey said during a hearing.

U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg last week ordered the rollback pending the outcome of a court appeal that could take months to resolve. Totenberg had refused at first to delay the policy change, but then reversed herself and ordered a halt to the new rules 24 hours after the transplant system started using them to match patients with donated organs.


Totenberg was considering holding UNOS in contempt after hospitals and patients challenging the new liver policy said the group was deliberately ignoring her order.

Frey said UNOS misunderstood the order, and there was never any intent to evade it. At Monday’s hearing, an information technology specialist for the group, Bonnie Felice, said it has already spent hundreds of hours reprogramming its system to revert to the old policy.

Totenberg appeared satisfied, and did not impose any sanctions on UNOS.

Totenberg is presiding over a lawsuit that claims the new policy will waste viable livers, result in fewer transplants and likely cause deaths. At issue in the suit is how donated livers are distributed to patients awaiting transplants.

Patients in population centers like New York and California must be closer to death before they reach the top of the transplant waiting list than people who live in places like the Midwest and South, where more organ donors mean patients who are less sick get transplanted faster. It’s such a problem wealthy patients often seek to be placed on shorter transplant lists far from home, like the late Apple CEO Steve Jobs, who lived in California but in 2009 got a new liver in Tennessee.

The new rules were intended to ease that geographic disparity by giving the sickest patients first chance at a donated liver, even if it has to be flown about 500 miles from the donor hospital.

UNOS predicted more than 100 lives a year would be saved as patients near death get a shot at a liver they’d otherwise never have received while the less sick waited a little longer.

But about a dozen hospitals in Kansas, Georgia and several other states sued, arguing the new rules will harm rural patients in particular as they lose local liver donations to big cities.


Associated Press medical writer Lauran Neergaard in Washington contributed to this report.