AP NEWS
Click to copy
Click to copy

Judge rejects suit to reinstate North Dakota women’s hockey

June 20, 2019
FILE - In this Oct. 2, 2013, file photo, United States Olympic Winter Games Hockey players Jocelyne Lamoureux, left, and Monique Lamoureux pose for a portrait at the Team USA Media Summit in Park City, Utah. A judge has thrown out a discrimination lawsuit by 11 former University of North Dakota women's hockey players seeking to have the program reinstated. School administrators cited budget woes when the program was dropped in the spring of 2017. The team reached the NCAA quarterfinals two straight years when twin sisters and U.S. Olympic stars Monique and Jocelyne Lamoureux were on the roster. (AP Photo/Carlo Allegri, File)
FILE - In this Oct. 2, 2013, file photo, United States Olympic Winter Games Hockey players Jocelyne Lamoureux, left, and Monique Lamoureux pose for a portrait at the Team USA Media Summit in Park City, Utah. A judge has thrown out a discrimination lawsuit by 11 former University of North Dakota women's hockey players seeking to have the program reinstated. School administrators cited budget woes when the program was dropped in the spring of 2017. The team reached the NCAA quarterfinals two straight years when twin sisters and U.S. Olympic stars Monique and Jocelyne Lamoureux were on the roster. (AP Photo/Carlo Allegri, File)

FARGO, N.D. (AP) — A judge has thrown out a discrimination lawsuit by 11 former University of North Dakota women’s hockey players seeking to reinstate a program that at one time included U.S. Olympic stars Monique and Jocelyne Lamoureux.

The complaint filed last summer against the North Dakota University System alleges that when the Grand Forks school dropped women’s hockey in the spring of 2017 it violated Title IX laws that prohibit women from being treated differently because of gender.

U.S. District Judge Daniel Hovland said in an order filed Wednesday that the suit did not show a “substantial disproportionality” between men’s and women’s athletic opportunities in relation to the respective enrollments of men and women. Attorney Daniel Siegel, who represents the players, said the issue should not be decided solely on proportionality but also on context.

“What I mean by that is that we’re not talking about the University of Miami, we’re talking about the University of North Dakota in a state and in a region where ice hockey is the most popular sport,” he said. “And girls and women are increasingly playing ice hockey, whether it’s at the high school, club or college level.

“Under these circumstances, we think that it’s apparent that the University of North Dakota is not treating female athletes as well as male athletes and we should be allowed to prove that,” he said. Siegel and the players are deciding whether to appeal.

Billie Jo Lorius, university system spokeswoman, said system officials are gratified by the court order.

“We no longer expect to comment on this case,” she said. “We remain focused on our main task of doing the best job we can for the students of North Dakota.”

The players said in their suit that the hockey program was “the most prominent and popular sport” among women’s athletics. The team reached the NCAA quarterfinals two straight years when the Lamoureux twins were on the roster. Several other former North Dakota players participated in the Olympics.

School administrators cited budget woes due to decreased support from the state when it dropped women’s hockey, as well as men’s and women’s swimming and diving. Prior to the lawsuit, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights dismissed two discrimination complaints related to the decision to get rid of women’s hockey.

University spokeswoman Meloney Linder said the school is pleased with the judge’s decision “and look forward to continuing to move UND athletics forward.”

All contents © copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.